Forum :: Lounge :: Is 2pac dead yes or no you tell me !

Ok me and my sister were sitting down listening to music and we looked up a song called dreamgirl (remix) by Akon Ft. 2pac.. I am very curious of if he's still alive cause me and me and my sis wants to know but also i searched up on google.com if he was alive or not and it said he was alive but is this true?

You are jesus, You should know D:.

I thought he was death so. Why would people write raps about him etc.

---
"Pineapples and shit."

Not to be a jerk but you never answered my question =o? Is he alive or dead?

I searched google and found his whole live story on wikipedia.

Click!

Maybe this answers your question.

---
"Pineapples and shit."

Yeah he's dead, if you'd like google wikipedia, and search both bigismalls(Think I spelled that right) also look up 2pac.

Tells the story there.

Yes he is dead. bigismalls + his gang shot 2pac.

Actually No one really knows who shot 2pac,that's why his murder has not been solved yet and most likely will not get solved.A lot of people reckon that Suge Knight(owner of Deathrow records) had something to do with 2pac's murder,and oddly enough some rappers today think  that 2pac is in cuba living it up.But personally I do think he is dead,he wouldn't be this quiet for this long if he was alive.But then again who knows?

Wikipedia is not a reliable site...

---
EOServ Class: Main Player, Mapping Artist, Oldbie

Who would even do that tho, Like hide for so long, That would, such a waste of time, but god only knows.

EDIT: @mackdude, You're kidding me right?

It's not 100% bud, but it's 99.9% it's as honest and truthful as any other site.

Give me one HUGE good reason why that site, is not "reliable" 

microchip posted: (15th Jun 2010 11:26 pm)

Who would even do that tho, Like hide for so long, That would, such a waste of time, but god only knows.

EDIT: @mackdude, You're kidding me right?

It's not 100% bud, but it's 99.9% it's as honest and truthful as any other site.

Give me one HUGE good reason why that site, is not "reliable" 

Lol, make an account, look at which ever article and most often than not, you will be available to "edit" the article, so anyone could put in some random bullshit in there...

---
EOServ Class: Main Player, Mapping Artist, Oldbie

microchip posted: (15th Jun 2010 11:26 pm)

Who would even do that tho, Like hide for so long, That would, such a waste of time, but god only knows.

EDIT: @mackdude, You're kidding me right?

It's not 100% bud, but it's 99.9% it's as honest and truthful as any other site.

Give me one HUGE good reason why that site, is not "reliable" 

Wikipedia is edited by it's users. It's not a reliable source of information. Wikipedia usually has sources for the information they publish but you shouldn't use Wikipedia as a source on any type of document that is to be used for official purposes. Anyone who passed 5th grade Literature should know this.

Scott posted: (16th Jun 2010 01:46 am)

microchip posted: (15th Jun 2010 11:26 pm)

Who would even do that tho, Like hide for so long, That would, such a waste of time, but god only knows.

EDIT: @mackdude, You're kidding me right?

It's not 100% bud, but it's 99.9% it's as honest and truthful as any other site.

Give me one HUGE good reason why that site, is not "reliable" 

Wikipedia is edited by it's users. It's not a reliable source of information. Wikipedia usually has sources for the information they publish but you shouldn't use Wikipedia as a source on any type of document that is to be used for official purposes. Anyone who passed 5th grade Literature shouldknow this.

Well yea maybe I went to far with the all users can edit, but he just snapped at me. Anyways, to the school I go to, they say never to use any wiki, or wikipedia, or wikianswers, or anything with wiki.

---
EOServ Class: Main Player, Mapping Artist, Oldbie

Mackdude posted: (16th Jun 2010 01:54 am)

Scott posted: (16th Jun 2010 01:46 am)

microchip posted: (15th Jun 2010 11:26 pm)

Who would even do that tho, Like hide for so long, That would, such a waste of time, but god only knows.

EDIT: @mackdude, You're kidding me right?

It's not 100% bud, but it's 99.9% it's as honest and truthful as any other site.

Give me one HUGE good reason why that site, is not "reliable" 

Wikipedia is edited by it's users. It's not a reliable source of information. Wikipedia usually has sources for the information they publish but you shouldn't use Wikipedia as a source on any type of document that is to be used for official purposes. Anyone who passed 5th grade Literatureshouldknow this.

Well yea maybe I went to far with the all users can edit, but he just snapped at me. Anyways, to the school I go to, they say never to use any wiki, or wikipedia, or wikianswers, or anything with wiki.

Okay then, inform me, whats a reliable source?

My school says it's not a reliable source because you can edit it, but half of my teachers said they still use it because it can be very helpful and it's 99% of the time true.

---
http://www.addipop.com

microchip posted: (16th Jun 2010 02:06 am)

Mackdude posted: (16th Jun 2010 01:54 am)

Scott posted: (16th Jun 2010 01:46 am)

microchip posted: (15th Jun 2010 11:26 pm)

Who would even do that tho, Like hide for so long, That would, such a waste of time, but god only knows.

EDIT: @mackdude, You're kidding me right?

It's not 100% bud, but it's 99.9% it's as honest and truthful as any other site.

Give me one HUGE good reason why that site, is not "reliable" 

Wikipedia is edited by it's users. It's not a reliable source of information. Wikipedia usually has sources for the information they publish but you shouldn't use Wikipedia as a source on any type of document that is to be used for official purposes. Anyone who passed 5th grade Literatureshouldknowthis.

Well yea maybe I went to far with the all users can edit, but he just snapped at me. Anyways, to the school I go to, they say never to use any wiki, or wikipedia, or wikianswers, or anything with wiki.

Okay then, inform me, whats a reliable source?

Incase you haven't noticed, Everything is edited and posted by "users" 

I have to disagree.

http://www.britannica.com/, http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/, etc. are reliable sources of information. They're written by qualified professionals in the field rather than a random person.

So what Scott, that's still all "written" by people.

Just as Wikipedia, I doubt people are going to write something and it not be true, if that's the case, nothing anywhere is true cause it's all written by PEOPLE.