Forum :: Lounge :: Endless Edge

Cyanide posted: (6th Jun 2013, 03:02 pm)

DanScott posted: (6th Jun 2013, 02:59 pm)

Cyanide posted: (6th Jun 2013, 02:42 pm)

Suirad posted: (5th Jun 2013, 11:40 pm)

jimmy posted: (5th Jun 2013, 11:15 pm)

Let me fill you guy's in... The person is attack EE, BU, and FE. Also, It just so happens when EOServ.net is attacked, it causes the servers to go down. I'm not going to tell you why, if you're not stupid it's pretty obvious. Anyways, It's not me either so don't say "amg its u" cause if it was me i would let you know :)

I am new around here, and am curious to find out who/what hurt your feelings enough to make you a causal asshat on this forum?

The fact we have users like you using words like asshat and going off topic makes him a casual asshat.

@Jimmy if they shut the check in off to the server list /what ever the fuck its  called that should stop the crashing when eoserv.net is attacked correct.

asshat is a great word XD. But in answer to your question I don't see how taking an SLN out could make the server crash (unless the server assumes the SLN is always going to be there and then crap out when it loses connection, but I really can't see Sausage assuming that.).

Well if I remember correctly when I used to mess with the servers if you had the SLN check on and had your internet off(for a offline server) it would crash the server. So assuming it crashed because it couldn't find the SLN then it should work the same when eoserv.net is down. (but this was awhile ago)

That's pretty bad that the server craps out when there's no SLN. And I struggle to believe that because it should just be a matter of a try { SLNCheckIn(); } catch { DoNothing(); } Obviously they're not actual functions in EOSERV before anyone starts being all like ;o that's not in teh sourz codez. U LIEZ. 

---
If money doesn't grow on trees, then why do banks have branches?

DanScott posted: (6th Jun 2013, 03:05 pm)

Cyanide posted: (6th Jun 2013, 03:02 pm)

DanScott posted: (6th Jun 2013, 02:59 pm)

Cyanide posted: (6th Jun 2013, 02:42 pm)

Suirad posted: (5th Jun 2013, 11:40 pm)

jimmy posted: (5th Jun 2013, 11:15 pm)

Let me fill you guy's in... The person is attack EE, BU, and FE. Also, It just so happens when EOServ.net is attacked, it causes the servers to go down. I'm not going to tell you why, if you're not stupid it's pretty obvious. Anyways, It's not me either so don't say "amg its u" cause if it was me i would let you know :)

I am new around here, and am curious to find out who/what hurt your feelings enough to make you a causal asshat on this forum?

The fact we have users like you using words like asshat and going off topic makes him a casual asshat.

@Jimmy if they shut the check in off to the server list /what ever the fuck its  called that should stop the crashing when eoserv.net is attacked correct.

asshat is a great word XD. But in answer to your question I don't see how taking an SLN out could make the server crash (unless the server assumes the SLN is always going to be there and then crap out when it loses connection, but I really can't see Sausage assuming that.).

Well if I remember correctly when I used to mess with the servers if you had the SLN check on and had your internet off(for a offline server) it would crash the server. So assuming it crashed because it couldn't find the SLN then it should work the same when eoserv.net is down. (but this was awhile ago)

That's pretty bad that the server craps out when there's no SLN. And I struggle to believe that because it should just be a matter of a try { SLNCheckIn(); } catch { DoNothing(); } Obviously they're not actual functions in EOSERV before anyone starts being all like ;o that's not in teh sourz codez. U LIEZ. 

Could of been fixed awhile ago, but who knows. I just know it was like that back when I cared to mess with maps and such.

---
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)CTronic.org 
I'm Nutso. Keep your fingers out of my butthole.

If the EOserv SLN is attacked, it can't connect to any servers.

As a result, it shows all servers as being offline, although they may actually be online.

Pharisee posted: (6th Jun 2013, 03:48 pm)

If the EOserv SLN is attacked, it can't connect to any servers.

As a result, it shows all servers as being offline, although they may actually be online.

Yes we all know that, but in one of the older revs(Not sure if it still works that way) and on seose if they couldn't connect to the list for what ever reason the server client would then shut down/crash.

---
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)CTronic.org 
I'm Nutso. Keep your fingers out of my butthole.

Oh, ok. Idk anything about that.

In errors log

> SLN check-in failed: negative HTTP response.

or

 > SLN check-in failed: HTTP request timed out.

With no crash or the server would crash every 5 min on SLN check in?

Possibly there is an issue with an accumulation of negatives or time outs.

---
Host of a blacklisted server...

Lol cyanide. You're a joke bro. You tell me to get a life but you were still mentioning my name in your pathetic argument with esf. I wasn`t even online anymore. Anyway, I never said the attacks was fun, nor did I say I cause them. There goes your stupidity again. You're a hypocrite for bashing us for arguing when you started to argue with the dude yourself. You're a vintage dumb ass and you're welcome.

Altered Bridge posted: (6th Jun 2013, 04:24 pm)

Lol cyanide. You're a joke bro. You tell me to get a life but you were still mentioning my name in your pathetic argument with esf. I wasn`t even online anymore. Anyway, I never said the attacks was fun, nor did I say I cause them. There goes your stupidity again. You're a hypocrite for bashing us for arguing when you started to argue with the dude yourself. You're a vintage dumb ass and you're welcome.

Lets examine this statement:
You're a joke bro.
- Why yes I am, I do find it fun to be a joke since the punchlines are always laugh worthy.. which in this case you sir are the punchline.

You tell me to get a life but you were still mentioning my name in your pathetic argument with esf.
- I didn't mention you by name once, what I did state was you guys think this is like school where everyone cares.

I wasn`t even online anymore.
-That's the plus about a forum system you don't have to be online.

Anyway, I never said the attacks was fun, nor did I say I cause them.
-Never said you did? What I said you guys find fun is calling each other names/liars/and bitching on the forums.

There goes your stupidity again.
-How so? Because you claimed I said things I never said? Gg I guess..

You're a hypocrite for bashing us for arguing when you started to argue with the dude yourself.
Wasn't really arguing, but I see where you are coming from.

You're a vintage dumb ass and you're welcome.
-Sweet I'm vintage! And thanks bro means alot.


P.s
My mission on these forums are always a success when I get a reply out of you guys/make you little rowdy poos get uppity.

---
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)CTronic.org 
I'm Nutso. Keep your fingers out of my butthole.

The theory that crashing all the servers when the SLN goes down is bogus. It may apply to servers that are still using obsolete versions of EOSERV, but that simply won't take down the entire lot of servers. EE's server was returning 402 connection timeouts during the attack on all servers. Now what these skids might think is that when eoserv.net is attacked the servers all crash. What happens is the SLN shows all of the servers offline. I think they were hoping for a different result. Maybe this effects older servers. You can easily disprove this by starting EOSERV and letting it connect to SLN once, then unplug the ethernet from your PC.

Apollo posted: (6th Jun 2013, 04:45 pm)

The theory that crashing all the servers when the SLN goes down is bogus. It may apply to servers that are still using obsolete versions of EOSERV, but that simply won't take down the entire lot of servers. EE's server was returning 402 connection timeouts during the attack on all servers. Now what these skids might think is that when eoserv.net is attacked the servers all crash. What happens is the SLN shows all of the servers offline. I think they were hoping for a different result. Maybe this effects older servers. You can easily disprove this by starting EOSERV and letting it connect to SLN once, then unplug the ethernet from your PC.

Well that's that Apollo has spoken. lol. I just remember the older version would crash, then if I turned the check in off it would work fine(so I figured I'd mention it). :P

---
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)CTronic.org 
I'm Nutso. Keep your fingers out of my butthole.

Cyanide posted: (6th Jun 2013, 02:42 pm)

Suirad posted: (5th Jun 2013, 11:40 pm)

jimmy posted: (5th Jun 2013, 11:15 pm)

Let me fill you guy's in... The person is attack EE, BU, and FE. Also, It just so happens when EOServ.net is attacked, it causes the servers to go down. I'm not going to tell you why, if you're not stupid it's pretty obvious. Anyways, It's not me either so don't say "amg its u" cause if it was me i would let you know :)

I am new around here, and am curious to find out who/what hurt your feelings enough to make you a causal asshat on this forum?

The fact we have users like you using words like asshat and going off topic makes him a casual asshat.

@Jimmy if they shut the check in off to the server list /what ever the fuck its  called that should stop the crashing when eoserv.net is attacked correct.

Take your own advice? don't tell other users to stay on-topic when you don't. 

---
Eoserva.

He's a hypocrite and since moonie is leaving, he's the new attention whore.

Jimmy told me on BU that he was the one DDoSing all of the servers, lol

---
"Nurd, you're like a fucking swiss army knife" - Necrosis

Nurd posted: (6th Jun 2013, 11:44 pm)

Jimmy told me on BU that he was the one DDoSing all of the servers, lol

inb4 everyone believes you even though you have no proof and everyone gets butthurt at jimmy then somehow the blame all goes to andrew and then nothing happens cause no one can do anything.

---
http://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=50893bf3be5ce293321529

I definitely remember EOSERV crashing in a lot of ways related to SLN. Before it was moved to a separate thread, eoserv.net being laggy but not offline would definitely stall the servers while they waited, and I'm sure there was a case where it tripped over itself.

I remember the crashing well enough that I apparently tried to re-fix it (http://files.eoserv.net/patches/r384.diff), but upon investigating, the first change in that file is literally useless, and the second covers a rare crash where EOSERV fails to bind to a free private range TCP port 10 times in a row (0.17% chance of it happening on a given day even if 30% of the ports of your system are in use: about 20,000 connections).

Unfortunately I can't stop old servers who are using old implementations from trying to connect (there are 3 out of 38 reporting themselves as pre-r256 EOSERV, as well as FE). I'd recommend those 3 servers turn off the SLN client in EOSERV and instead run a separate program such as:

<?php
$retry = 600;
$host = "example.org";
$port = 8078;
$name = "Example Server";
$url = "http://example.org/";
while (true) { echo file_get_contents("http://sln.eoserv.net/check?software=EOSERV&retry="+urlencode($retry)+"&host="+urlencode($host)+"&port="+urlencode($port)+"&name="+urlencode($name)+"&url="+urlencode($url)+"), "\n"; sleep($retry); }