Forum :: Lounge :: Watchdogs

Jasper posted: (31st Aug 2011, 02:18 am)

AustinB posted: (31st Aug 2011, 12:10 am)

Useless posts are useless. 

OT: Most likely everyone in this post that's not already moderator, will not get to be a moderator.

That's a really retarded statement.

Also Addison: <3333333

You may think it's retarded, but it's true.

---
Create your own destiny, don't let someone else do it for you.

AustinB posted: (31st Aug 2011, 03:57 pm)

Jasper posted: (31st Aug 2011, 02:18 am)

AustinB posted: (31st Aug 2011, 12:10 am)

Useless posts are useless. 

OT: Most likely everyone in this post that's not already moderator, will not get to be a moderator.

That's a really retarded statement.

Also Addison: <3333333

You may think it's retarded, but it's true.

agreed we now have good trolless mods and most ppl on here (including myself) won't be able to become one if anyone would bcome mod i think it would be one of tah good pixel artists

Pixel Artists really won't I have never seen a mod that is a artist idk why :P and austin it's not true.

Jasper posted: (31st Aug 2011, 02:18 am)

AustinB posted: (31st Aug 2011, 12:10 am)

Useless posts are useless. 

OT: Most likely everyone in this post that's not already moderator, will not get to be a moderator.

That's a really retarded statement.

Also Addison: <3333333

You're a really retarded statement.

It doesn't have to make sense :D

Austin's statement is pretty damn accurate XD

---
Web developer, currently looking for graphic artists / designers.

bittertaste posted: (31st Aug 2011, 06:23 pm)

AustinB posted: (31st Aug 2011, 03:57 pm)

Jasper posted: (31st Aug 2011, 02:18 am)

AustinB posted: (31st Aug 2011, 12:10 am)

Useless posts are useless. 

OT: Most likely everyone in this post that's not already moderator, will not get to be a moderator.

That's a really retarded statement.

Also Addison: <3333333

You may think it's retarded, but it's true.

agreed we now have good trolless mods and most ppl on here (including myself) won't be able to become one if anyone would bcome mod i think it would be one of tah good pixel artists

I agree with jasper on that part. Pixel artists have no reason to become a mod. How would being a good pixeler help you become a mod? The only people thatshould become a mod are ones that :

---
Andrewbob - I would be on the fucking copter of rofls

Programmer, Web Developer, and Graphics Designer

Klutz posted: (31st Aug 2011, 09:34 pm)

Jasper posted: (31st Aug 2011, 02:18 am)

AustinB posted: (31st Aug 2011, 12:10 am)

Useless posts are useless. 

OT: Most likely everyone in this post that's not already moderator, will not get to be a moderator.

That's a really retarded statement.

Also Addison: <3333333

You're a really retarded statement.

It doesn't have to make sense :D

Austin's statement is pretty damn accurate XD

Agreed!

---
Create your own destiny, don't let someone else do it for you.

I've actually wondered why we haven't had a pixel artist mod myself. I mean, when it comes to modding, it makes no difference whether you have an artistic background or a coding background, as long as you know the rules needed to be enforced and have plenty of information to input on relevant topics.

Mods can't really add too much to the artist's section if they don't have significant background in that area, however they cover the remaining areas/sections perfectly.

Imo, it'd be nice to have one pixel artist mod. Aha. But that's just my two cents, it doesn't matter either way.

---
Oh, it's you.
[Omni, Seraphim, Idea, Returnity]

Misca posted: (30th Aug 2011, 06:59 pm)

eternity posted: (30th Aug 2011, 06:50 pm)

Ananas posted: (30th Aug 2011, 10:05 am)

eternity posted: (30th Aug 2011, 09:24 am)

Ananas posted: (30th Aug 2011, 09:04 am)

As watchdog you could approve and deny guest posts, and basically see what mods did (Moving, deleting, etc).
Because this was rather pointless, people as watchdog got demoted.

As far as I know, only me and Syran were watchdogs back then.

Basicially their people with no life and make sure mods arent abusing power so basically we need people who are on forums alot and they see what their doing with their power and why
but if a watchdog caught a mod breaking a rule I guess he would tell sausage or something
Lol perfect job for a spammer
EX: Me =P

Basically people with no life? You can still have a life, but instead of spamming the forums (like you), you actually had a purpose on this community.
Mostly people that atleast contributed something to this community. (Instead of useless spamming etc).

I contributed, Jerk =/

Name one thing then, All I see is two -1's on

https://eoserv.net/forum/rated/eternity

hollow has like -10 and his release is ike the biggest topic on forum o.o

fruity posted: (1st Sep 2011, 03:43 am)

Misca posted: (30th Aug 2011, 06:59 pm)

eternity posted: (30th Aug 2011, 06:50 pm)

Ananas posted: (30th Aug 2011, 10:05 am)

eternity posted: (30th Aug 2011, 09:24 am)

Ananas posted: (30th Aug 2011, 09:04 am)

As watchdog you could approve and deny guest posts, and basically see what mods did (Moving, deleting, etc).
Because this was rather pointless, people as watchdog got demoted.

As far as I know, only me and Syran were watchdogs back then.

Basicially their people with no life and make sure mods arent abusing power so basically we need people who are on forums alot and they see what their doing with their power and why
but if a watchdog caught a mod breaking a rule I guess he would tell sausage or something
Lol perfect job for a spammer
EX: Me =P

Basically people with no life? You can still have a life, but instead of spamming the forums (like you), you actually had a purpose on this community.
Mostly people that atleast contributed something to this community. (Instead of useless spamming etc).

I contributed, Jerk =/

Name one thing then, All I see is two -1's on

https://eoserv.net/forum/rated/eternity

hollow has like -10 and his release is ike the biggest topic on forum o.o

It doesn't matter what the biggest topic is, there used to be a topic with almost 100 pages. Why would he get a + rating? I'm not sure why they don't give + ratings for revisions. But it should stay like that in less you are releasing guides on how to add specific coding to your server.

Plus, even if you did get +'s for revisions... Hollow wouldn't deserve one because he's to much of a pussy to share the source. It's not even that good . I have the 2.9 source myself. I get like 100 warnings compiling it.

If it was an open source, maybe it should get a rating due to all the features to use for themselfs;)

lolss posted: (1st Sep 2011, 03:54 am)

fruity posted: (1st Sep 2011, 03:43 am)

Misca posted: (30th Aug 2011, 06:59 pm)

eternity posted: (30th Aug 2011, 06:50 pm)

Ananas posted: (30th Aug 2011, 10:05 am)

eternity posted: (30th Aug 2011, 09:24 am)

Ananas posted: (30th Aug 2011, 09:04 am)

As watchdog you could approve and deny guest posts, and basically see what mods did (Moving, deleting, etc).
Because this was rather pointless, people as watchdog got demoted.

As far as I know, only me and Syran were watchdogs back then.

Basicially their people with no life and make sure mods arent abusing power so basically we need people who are on forums alot and they see what their doing with their power and why
but if a watchdog caught a mod breaking a rule I guess he would tell sausage or something
Lol perfect job for a spammer
EX: Me =P

Basically people with no life? You can still have a life, but instead of spamming the forums (like you), you actually had a purpose on this community.
Mostly people that atleast contributed something to this community. (Instead of useless spamming etc).

I contributed, Jerk =/

Name one thing then, All I see is two -1's on

https://eoserv.net/forum/rated/eternity

hollow has like -10 and his release is ike the biggest topic on forum o.o

It doesn't matter what the biggest topic is, there used to be a topic with almost 100 pages. Why would he get a + rating? I'm not sure why they don't give + ratings for revisions. But it should stay like that in less you are releasing guides on how to add specific coding to your server.

Plus, even if you did get +'s for revisions... Hollow wouldn't deserve one because he's to much of a pussy to share the source. It's not even that good . I have the 2.9 source myself. I get like 100 warnings compiling it.

If it was an open source, maybe it should get a rating due to all the features to use for themselfs;)

Warning's doesn't mean the code is shit. If the code doesn't work or is buggy, then it's shit. Hell, I'm sure I could get rid of all the warnings in an hour at tops. It's just simple forgotten shit, that won't affect your code.

I think what that one guy meant was that Hollow contributes to this community even though he has a shitty rating. The rating is just to warn you guys about what you're doing wrong on the forums and that you should be aware of it next time.

---
http://www.addipop.com

Addison posted: (1st Sep 2011, 03:56 am)

lolss posted: (1st Sep 2011, 03:54 am)

fruity posted: (1st Sep 2011, 03:43 am)

Misca posted: (30th Aug 2011, 06:59 pm)

eternity posted: (30th Aug 2011, 06:50 pm)

Ananas posted: (30th Aug 2011, 10:05 am)

eternity posted: (30th Aug 2011, 09:24 am)

Ananas posted: (30th Aug 2011, 09:04 am)

As watchdog you could approve and deny guest posts, and basically see what mods did (Moving, deleting, etc).
Because this was rather pointless, people as watchdog got demoted.

As far as I know, only me and Syran were watchdogs back then.

Basicially their people with no life and make sure mods arent abusing power so basically we need people who are on forums alot and they see what their doing with their power and why
but if a watchdog caught a mod breaking a rule I guess he would tell sausage or something
Lol perfect job for a spammer
EX: Me =P

Basically people with no life? You can still have a life, but instead of spamming the forums (like you), you actually had a purpose on this community.
Mostly people that atleast contributed something to this community. (Instead of useless spamming etc).

I contributed, Jerk =/

Name one thing then, All I see is two -1's on

https://eoserv.net/forum/rated/eternity

hollow has like -10 and his release is ike the biggest topic on forum o.o

It doesn't matter what the biggest topic is, there used to be a topic with almost 100 pages. Why would he get a + rating? I'm not sure why they don't give + ratings for revisions. But it should stay like that in less you are releasing guides on how to add specific coding to your server.

Plus, even if you did get +'s for revisions... Hollow wouldn't deserve one because he's to much of a pussy to share the source. It's not even that good . I have the 2.9 source myself. I get like 100 warnings compiling it.

If it was an open source, maybe it should get a rating due to all the features to use for themselfs;)

Warning's doesn't mean the code is shit. If the code doesn't work or is buggy, then it's shit. Hell, I'm sure I could get rid of all the warnings in an hour at tops. It's just simple forgotten shit, that won't affect your code.

I think what that one guy meant was that Hollow contributes to this community even though he has a shitty rating. The rating is just to warn you guys about what you're doing wrong on the forums and that you should be aware of it next time.

 

one guy Wtf   i has a name :D

Addison posted: (1st Sep 2011, 03:56 am)

lolss posted: (1st Sep 2011, 03:54 am)

fruity posted: (1st Sep 2011, 03:43 am)

Misca posted: (30th Aug 2011, 06:59 pm)

eternity posted: (30th Aug 2011, 06:50 pm)

Ananas posted: (30th Aug 2011, 10:05 am)

eternity posted: (30th Aug 2011, 09:24 am)

Ananas posted: (30th Aug 2011, 09:04 am)

As watchdog you could approve and deny guest posts, and basically see what mods did (Moving, deleting, etc).
Because this was rather pointless, people as watchdog got demoted.

As far as I know, only me and Syran were watchdogs back then.

Basicially their people with no life and make sure mods arent abusing power so basically we need people who are on forums alot and they see what their doing with their power and why
but if a watchdog caught a mod breaking a rule I guess he would tell sausage or something
Lol perfect job for a spammer
EX: Me =P

Basically people with no life? You can still have a life, but instead of spamming the forums (like you), you actually had a purpose on this community.
Mostly people that atleast contributed something to this community. (Instead of useless spamming etc).

I contributed, Jerk =/

Name one thing then, All I see is two -1's on

https://eoserv.net/forum/rated/eternity

hollow has like -10 and his release is ike the biggest topic on forum o.o

It doesn't matter what the biggest topic is, there used to be a topic with almost 100 pages. Why would he get a + rating? I'm not sure why they don't give + ratings for revisions. But it should stay like that in less you are releasing guides on how to add specific coding to your server.

Plus, even if you did get +'s for revisions... Hollow wouldn't deserve one because he's to much of a pussy to share the source. It's not even that good . I have the 2.9 source myself. I get like 100 warnings compiling it.

If it was an open source, maybe it should get a rating due to all the features to use for themselfs;)

Warning's doesn't mean the code is shit. If the code doesn't work or is buggy, then it's shit. Hell, I'm sure I could get rid of all the warnings in an hour at tops. It's just simple forgotten shit, that won't affect your code.

I think what that one guy meant was that Hollow contributes to this community even though he has a shitty rating. The rating is just to warn you guys about what you're doing wrong on the forums and that you should be aware of it next time.

Yes I noticed that, he has like 20 releases that I use and they have no + rating? Pretty stupid.

lolss posted: (1st Sep 2011, 04:06 am)

Addison posted: (1st Sep 2011, 03:56 am)

lolss posted: (1st Sep 2011, 03:54 am)

fruity posted: (1st Sep 2011, 03:43 am)

Misca posted: (30th Aug 2011, 06:59 pm)

eternity posted: (30th Aug 2011, 06:50 pm)

Ananas posted: (30th Aug 2011, 10:05 am)

eternity posted: (30th Aug 2011, 09:24 am)

Ananas posted: (30th Aug 2011, 09:04 am)

As watchdog you could approve and deny guest posts, and basically see what mods did (Moving, deleting, etc).
Because this was rather pointless, people as watchdog got demoted.

As far as I know, only me and Syran were watchdogs back then.

Basicially their people with no life and make sure mods arent abusing power so basically we need people who are on forums alot and they see what their doing with their power and why
but if a watchdog caught a mod breaking a rule I guess he would tell sausage or something
Lol perfect job for a spammer
EX: Me =P

Basically people with no life? You can still have a life, but instead of spamming the forums (like you), you actually had a purpose on this community.
Mostly people that atleast contributed something to this community. (Instead of useless spamming etc).

I contributed, Jerk =/

Name one thing then, All I see is two -1's on

https://eoserv.net/forum/rated/eternity

hollow has like -10 and his release is ike the biggest topic on forum o.o

It doesn't matter what the biggest topic is, there used to be a topic with almost 100 pages. Why would he get a + rating? I'm not sure why they don't give + ratings for revisions. But it should stay like that in less you are releasing guides on how to add specific coding to your server.

Plus, even if you did get +'s for revisions... Hollow wouldn't deserve one because he's to much of a pussy to share the source. It's not even that good . I have the 2.9 source myself. I get like 100 warnings compiling it.

If it was an open source, maybe it should get a rating due to all the features to use for themselfs;)

Warning's doesn't mean the code is shit. If the code doesn't work or is buggy, then it's shit. Hell, I'm sure I could get rid of all the warnings in an hour at tops. It's just simple forgotten shit, that won't affect your code.

I think what that one guy meant was that Hollow contributes to this community even though he has a shitty rating. The rating is just to warn you guys about what you're doing wrong on the forums and that you should be aware of it next time.

Yes I noticed that, he has like 20 releases that I use and they have no + rating? Pretty stupid.

I positively rate posts that I think are useful, and yes, I do think Hollow's revisions are useful. I could do better, but hey, he wants to hack in all the stuff noobs want. When I log on to the forums, I look at the most recent actions and just view a few topics, I probably ended up missing his post and never have positively rated him. He probably does deserve it, but big deal, the ratings aren't that important anyways.

---
http://www.addipop.com

hollows has  released 3.7 releases  and alot of it is his own codes WHy should he release for sum newb to just Claim HIS work for there own..

fruity posted: (1st Sep 2011, 04:10 am)

hollows has  released 3.7 releases  and alot of it is his own codes WHy should he release for sum newb to just Claim HIS work for there own..

He probably has a kind soul or some shit. That's why I don't release anything precious to me.

---
http://www.addipop.com