Bug #279: Lack of function/variable distinction
ID | #279 |
---|---|
Submitter | Sausage |
Product | EOSERV |
Severity | Normal |
Status | CLOSED, WONTFIX |
Submitted | 3rd Feb 2014 |
Updated | 19th Jun 2016 |
10 years, 47 weeks ago
The exp() function is missing as it would conflict with a variable named exp. exp(exp) could be interpreted as function exp applied to variable exp, but function names in non-calling contexts will always be ambiguous.
Comments
8 years, 27 weeks ago
r508 fixed the exponential/experience mixup, and I don't think it's a great idea to do this and potentially rule out adding function references in the future.
Updated Status to CLOSED, WONTFIX
Add Comment
Please don't post unless you have something relevant to the bug to say.
Do not comment to say "thanks" or "fix this please".
Please log in to add comments. EOSERV Bug Tracker > Bug #279: Lack of function/variable distinction